June Jobs Report: Overall Good, Despite Headlines


Well, it’s the first Friday of the month, which means that the Bureau of Labor Statistics has released another Employment Situation Report, colloquially known as the jobs report. In this case, the headline numbers were somewhat mixed. The number of new jobs created came in at 213K, beating the consensus of 195K, but hourly earnings disappointed and the unemployment rate increased. As usual however, one needs to look beyond the headline numbers in order to understand the true situation in the jobs market.

As just mentioned, the number of new jobs created came in at 213K, beating the 195K consensus of the nation’s economists. This marks yet another increase in what has thus far been one of the longest periods of employment growth on record. The June number is also one of the strongest prints over the past eight years:



Source: Zero Hedge

However, one of the problems with this headline number is that it makes no attempt to differentiate between differing qualities of jobs. For example, few people would argue that a full-time job is far superior to a part-time one, especially for a person that is trying to support themselves and their family. However, particularly in the years immediately following the last recession, the overwhelming majority of new jobs created were part-time ones. Thus, there were numerous instances of individuals that were formerly working full-time jobs that allowed for a middle-class lifestyle being forced to work multiple part-time jobs just to keep food on the table due to a lack of full-time positions available. While recent months have shown an improvement in this area, June was a clear exception to this. As we can see, the number of full-time workers declined by 89K while the number of part-time workers increased by 145K in the month.



Source: Zero Hedge

While this is certainly disappointing, the good news is that this appears to be an outlier. As we can see here, the majority of new jobs created over the past year have been full-time positions.

ALSO READ   President-elect looks to tree planting to create Mexico jobs



Source: Zero Hedge

Another problem that has been present throughout much of the recovery thus far is that the majority of the jobs created have been in low-wage industries such as hospitality and retail. Such jobs do little in the consumer-based economy of the United States as they generally do not pay enough for an individual to support themselves, let alone a family or allow for much in the way of discretionary purchases. Thus, let us have a look at what industries added jobs during June to see if this is still the case. This chart shows each of the industries as categorized by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and how many jobs they added during the months of May and June:



Source: Zero Hedge

As we can see here, the top jobs-creating industries in the month of June were Education and Health, Professional and Business Services excluding Temporary Help, and Manufacturing. While Education and Health can be debatable, for the most part, these are all relatively high-paying industries. These are all industries that provide high enough wages for a comfortable middle class lifestyle, which is definitely a positive for the economy as a whole as it boosts the demand for goods and services in aggregate. Interestingly, the only industry that had net job losses in June was retail trade, which can mostly be explained by the Toys-R-Us bankruptcy layoffs. Fortunately, most of these are unskilled low-wage positions so it seems likely that many of the displaced workers will be able to find new jobs in relatively short order.

It may come as something of a surprise to some that the unemployment rate increased despite the relative strength in job creations. As mentioned in the introduction, the unemployment rate increased from 3.8% to 4.0% in June. However, this should not be a surprise to anyone that has been following my work over the past few years. As I have explained in the past, for quite some time now, the unemployment rate has appeared artificially low due to the large number of people that are removed from the official figures due to not looking for work during the month. In fact, last month there were approximately 102 million Americans of working age that did not have a job for one reason or another. In June, we saw some of these people begin to look for work again, which increased the number of unemployed people. In June, we saw the official number of unemployed go from 6.065 million to 6.564 million. As the numerator in the calculation went up, so did the unemployment rate. This also had the desirable effect of increasing the labor force participation rate.

ALSO READ   Fear about jobs keeps fueling anti-migrant sentiment and xenophobia in South Africa



Source: Zero Hedge

This is actually a good thing as it shows that formerly discouraged workers have begun to believe the whole jobs recovery narrative and have once again become optimistic about their prospects of finding work and thus have started searching again. With that said though, at 62.9%, the labor force participation rate is still at levels that it last held during the 1970s, so the economy still clearly has a long way to go until it has fully recovered.

Perhaps the biggest disappointment in the jobs report is that average hourly earnings missed expectations of a 2.8% increase year-over-year in June and saw only a 2.7% increase. In addition, average hourly earnings were relatively flat from May’s level:



Source: Zero Hedge

However, average weekly earnings were up 3.0% year-over-year:



Source: Zero Hedge

The primary reason for this is that the number of hours worked in a given week actually increased year-over-year, although it was flat month-over-month at 34.5. It was in manufacturing that the gains came as workers in that industry worked an average of 40.9 hours per week in June, an increase over 0.1 hours month-over-month. In addition, overtime edged up by 0.1 hours to 3.5 per week month-over-month. These increases would naturally increase the weekly earnings of workers, even if their hourly wages did not actually increase.

Ordinarily during times of a labor shortage, which several media headlines claim that we are now in, we would expect to see wages grow fairly aggressively. This is due to the economic law of supply and demand. A labor shortage would imply that there are more jobs available than there are workers to fill them. Thus, employers will compete against each other by boosting wages to secure the human capital that they need to conduct their business activities. However, as already mentioned, there are still a substantial number of people that do not have jobs (as evidenced by the labor force participation rate). As these people can still enter the labor force and increase the supply of labor, they represent a moderating force on wage growth.

ALSO READ   Artificial Intelligence May Help Match Veterans with Civilian Jobs

Another factor that may be holding wage growth down is the large population of people that are only working part-time. As just shown earlier, the month of June saw a net loss of full-time positions and an increase in part-time positions. As part-time jobs typically pay less than full-time ones on both an hourly and total basis, this has the effect of skewing the overall average lower.

Overall, this was quite a good jobs report despite the mixed headlines. With that said, the apparent shift from full-time to part-time work is undeniably a negative if it persists going forward. In addition, there remains a substantial number of people out of work which shows that the economy still has quite a ways to go to fully recover. Overall though, it does appear to be on the right track.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.





READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply